Cheilosia (Cheilosia) uviformis Becker 1894
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cheilosia (Cheilosia) uviformis Becker, 1894 Fig. 74 Chilosia uviformis Becker, 1894: 499. Differential diagnosis Cheilosia uviformis is difficult to identify, mainly because it is inconclusive in two characters often used in the identification of Cheilosia: the sterna are only slightly pruinose, which could be interpreted as either pruinose or shiny, and in the female the eye is sparsely pilose, which could easily be missed and consequently, the eye pilosity could be interpreted as either bare or pilose (the eye is distinctly pilose in the male). It is very similar to C. psilophthalma, whose Caucasian population also has slightly pruinose sterna. It is distinguishable from C. psilophthalma by bicoloured claws with orange base and black apex (claws all black in C. psilophthalma); the male by densely pruinose frons (shiny or indistinctly pruinose in that of C. psilophthalma) and narrow parafacia, about half as wide as width of postpedicel (about 0.8 times as wide as width of postpedicel in C. psilophthalma) and the female by sparse pilose eye (with distinct pile in that of C. psilophthalma). For differences with other species of Cheilosia, see Bot & Van de Meutter (2023). Material examined Cheilosia uviformis was not collected in 2018, but collected in 2019. GEORGIA – Racha-Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti • 1 ♂; 42.9150° N, 43.1430° E; 1969 m a.s.l.; 19 Jun. 2019; S. Bot leg.; SBA, SB.002942 • 1 ♂; 42.9160° N, 43.1428° E; 1975 m a.s.l.; 19 Jun. 2019; X. Mengual leg.; ZFMK, ZFMK-DIP-00066504 • 4 ♂♂; Tsana; 42.9089° N, 43.1425° E; 1900 m a.s.l.; 19 Jun. 2019 F. Van de Meutter leg.; FMT. – Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti • 1 ♂; 43.1133° N, 42.7378° E; 1800 m a.s.l.; 14 Jun. 2019; X. Mengual leg.; ZFMK, ZFMK-DIP-00066507 = ZFMKTIS-8008814 • 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Ushguli; 42.9500° N, 43.0719° E; 2270 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; F. Van de Meutter leg.; FMT • 8 ♂♂; 43.0671° N, 42.9471° E; 2684 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; J.H. Skevington leg.; CNC, CNC1386513, CNC1386514, CNC1386523, CNC1386528, CNC1386534, CNC1386537, CNC1386554, CNC1386558 • 1 ♂; 42.9437° N, 43.0539° E; 2220 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; X. Mengual leg.; ZFMK, ZFMK-DIP-00066506 • 2 ♂♂; 42.9498° N, 43.0718° E; 2270 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; X. Mengual leg.; ZFMK, ZFMK-DIP-00066505, ZFMK-DIP-00066508 = ZFMK-TIS-8008813 • 5 ♂♂; Ushguli; 42.56° N, 43.04° E; 2260 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; J. van Steenis leg.; JSB, 2019-01.123, 2019- 01.124, 2019-01.126 to 2019-01.128 • 2 ♂♂; 42.9480° N, 43.0700° E; 2258 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 2019; S. Bot leg.; SBA, SB.002950, SB.002951 • 1 ♂; Ushguli; 42.94° N, 43.05° E; 2220 m a.s.l.; 15–17 Jun. 2019; X. Mengual leg.; Malaise trap; ZFMK, ZFMK-TIS-8010119 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; ZFMK, ZFMK-TIS-8010118 • 4 ♀♀; Ushguli; 42.94° N, 43.05° E; 2220 m a.s.l.; 15–17 Jun. 2019; J. van Steenis leg.; JSB, 2019-01.100 to 2019-01.103 • 3 ♂♂; 42.9090° N, 43.0070° E; 2294 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2019; S. Bot leg.; SBA, SB.002947 to SB.002949 • 1 ♂; Ushguli; 42.56° N, 43.04° E; 2260 m a.s.l.; 16 Jun. 2019; J. van Steenis leg.; 2019-01.180; JSB • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; 2 km SW of Ushguli; 43.0052° N, 42,8986° E; 2550 m a.s.l.; 17 Jun. 2019; F. Van de Meutter leg.; FMT • 1 ♀; 2 km SW of Ushguli; 43.0052° N, 42,9036° E; 2550 m a.s.l.; 17 Jun. 2019; F. Van de Meutter leg.; FMT • 3 ♂; 42.8980° N, 43.0080° E; 2601 m a.s.l.; 18 Jun. 2019; S. Bot leg.; SBA, SB.002944 to SB.002946 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; SBA, SB.002943 • 3 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀; 2 km SW of Ushguli; 43.0052° N, 42,8986° E; 2550 m a.s.l.; 18 Jun. 2019; F. Van de Meutter leg.; FMT • 3 ♂♂; 42.8964° N, 43.0047° E; 2658 m a.s.l.; 18 Jun. 2019; J.H. Skevington leg.; CNC, CNC1386812, CNC1386814, CNC1386817 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; CNC, CNC1386806 • 1 ♂; Zagarari Pass; 42.91° N, 43.09° E; 2585 m a.s.l.; 18 Jun. 2019; J. van Steenis leg.; JSB, 2019-01.145. Genetics DNA barcodes of European and Caucasian specimens of C. uviformis cluster together with high support (BS = 100%). Remarks Reported from the Caucasus for the first time. Biology Remarkably, only sampled in 2019 while areas of occurrence were also visited in other years. Collected between 14 June and 20 June at an altitude between 1800 and 2684 m a.s.l. All specimens were caught visiting willow Salix sp. catkins on alpine and subalpine grasslands. Distribution Europe and Caucasus (Georgia).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".