Andrena (Micrandrena) minutuloides Perkins 1914
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3.1.2.18.Andrena(Micrandrena)minutuloidesPerkins, 1914 Figures 18 C, I, 21 F Andrena minutuloides Perkins, 1914: 114, ♀ ♂ [England: NHMUK or OUMNH]. Andrena parvuloides Perkins, 1914: 114, ♀ [England: NHMUK or OUMNH]. Andrena sparsiciliata Alfken, 1925: 165 [Germany: ZMB]. Distribution and habitat. Broadly West and Central Palaearctic, in diverse habitats. In the Levant, A single female was recorded from northern Lebanon, at 1600 m (Wood et al. 2020). Flight period. In Europe, the species flies in two generations between April – September. Flower preferences. Broadly polylectic. Pollen hosts include Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Lamiaceae, Rosaceae and Scrophulariaceae (Westrich 1989; IUCN 2024). The second generation shows a strong preference for Apiaceae (TJW, unpublished data). Material examined. BELGIUM ● 1 ♀; Liège, Pont-de-Seraing, Rue des Conquerais; 50.6214°N 5.5127°E; 27 Apr. 2021; T. Wood leg.; BOLD accession no. WPATW 095-21; TJWC. – LEBANON: See Wood et al. 2020. – MOROCCO ● 1 ♀; Fès-Meknès, Boulemane, 5 km SE, junction of R 503 and N 4; 33.3288°N – 4.6962°W; 1900 m a. s. l.; 19 May 2022; T. Wood leg.; BOLD accession no. WPATW 456-22; TJWC. – ROMANIA ● 1 ♀; Iași, Grădina Botanică “ Anastasie Fătu ”; 47.1865°N 27.5497°E; 27 Jul. 2023; T. Wood leg.; BOLD accession no. ORBIT 214-23; TJWC. – SPAIN ● 1 ♀; Bernuy de Porreros, Fuente de los Caños; 41.006°N – 4.1102°W; 20 Jul. 2021; T. Wood leg.; BOLD accession no. WPATW 342-21; TJWC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".