Bibliographic record
Abstract
3.1.1.2.Andrena(Micrandrena)govindaWarncke, 1974 Figures 13 J, K, 19 I Andrena govinda Warncke, 1974 b: 14, 41, ♀ ♂ [Egypt: OLML]. Andrena govinda ssp. eremitica Warncke, 1974 b: 14, 41, ♀ ♂ [Tunisia: OLML]. Distribution and habitat. Desert habitats in north Africa and the Levant (southern Israel, Jordan *, Syria *, Pisanty et al. 2018). Flight period. Early February to late April. Flower records. Collected from Brassicaceae (Diplotaxis, Erucaria, Zilla) and Nitrariaceae (Nitraria). Material examined. HOLOTYPE: EGYPT ● ♀; Wadi Digla; 12 Feb. 1932; H. Priesner leg.; OLML. – non-type material: ISRAEL ● 1 ♀; Arava, 4 km W of Hazeva; 19–29 Feb. 1988; R. Leys leg.; RMNH ZMA.INS.5104494 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; TJWC ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 27 Feb. 1990; RMNH ZMA.INS.5102911 ● 3 ♂; Hazeva; 11 Feb. 2009; A. Gotlieb leg.; SMNHTAU 27073, 27074, 27080 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 12 Feb. 2010; on Zilla spinosa; SMNHTAU 33212 ● 1 ♀; Iddan; 15 Feb. 2009; A. Gotlieb leg.; SMNHTAU 27098 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; SMNHTAU 27129 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 11 Mar. 2009; SMNHTAU 27332 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 9 Feb. 2010; on Erucaria rostrata; SMNHTAU 33170 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 6 Mar. 2010; on Zilla spinosa; SMNHTAU 57616 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shahaq, Shezaf Nat. [ure] Res. [erve]; 30°44.26’N 35°14.58’E; – 120 m a. s. l.; 2 Mar. 1997; O. Niehuis leg.; SMNHTAU ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 4 Mar. 1997 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 30°45.10’N 35°15.35’E; 20 Feb. 1997 ● 1 ♂; ibid.; 30°45.99’N 35°15.94’E ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shezaf; 9 Feb. 2021; A. Dorchin leg.; SMNHTAU 358594 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shezaf; 30.722°N 35.270°E; 13 Feb. 2016; G. Pisanty leg.; on Brassicaceae; SMNHTAU 234061 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; BOLD accession no. ANDIL 216-22; SMNHTAU 234060 ● 1 ♀; ibid.; 14 Feb. 2016; SMNHTAU 234068 ● 1 ♀; Nahal Shezaf, 2 km N ‘ En Yahav; – 140 m a. s. l.; 6 Mar. 2013; A. Dorchin leg.; TJWC ● 1 ♀; Nahal Zin; 17 Mar. 2009; H. Carmely leg.; SMNHTAU 30923 ● 2 ♀; Negev, 2 km E Yeroham; 21 Mar. 1990; R. Leys leg.; RMNH ZMA.INS.5102746. – JORDAN ● 1 ♀; Rawayshid [Ruwaished]; 23 Apr. 1996; Ma. Halada leg.; OLML ● 1 ♂; Wadi Rum; 900 m a. s. l.; 17 Mar. 1988; L. Blank leg.; TJWC. – SYRIA ● 1 ♀; asr al-Hiras-Sharqi, Dayr Az-Zor; 250 m a. s. l.; 23 Mar. 1988; L. Blank leg.; OLML ● 1 ♀; 30 km W Palmyra; 580 m a. s. l.; 23 Apr. 1992; K. Warncke leg.; OLML.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".