MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7103984092 · doi:10.17603/ds2-2th1-6q44

Regional Accessibility of Post-Earthquake Emergency Healthcare in Metro Vancouver, BC

2025· dataset· en· W7103984092 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas Advanced Computing Center · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Metropolitan areaResilience (materials science)DocumentationHealth careEmergency managementGeocodingInterdependenceGeographic information system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The system under investigation is the regional network of emergency healthcare facilities and transportation infrastructure in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia. This dataset was developed to support a regional assessment of healthcare accessibility following a major earthquake hazard, specifically under a suite of physics-based Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) M9 earthquake scenarios. The dataset integrates spatial information on hospitals with emergency departments, bridges, and the regional road network, along with estimated seismic damage states for healthcare and bridge assets based on seismic fragility analysis. The data address the research problem of quantifying how earthquake-induced physical damage affects access to critical medical services. Hospital functionality and bridge performance are combined with accessibility metrics based on the Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) method to evaluate system-level interdependencies and spatial variations in emergency healthcare availability after an earthquake. The dataset can be reused to reproduce or validate regional accessibility assessments or incorporate information for multi-hazard assessments of regional infrastructure. The data are valuable for researchers, infrastructure planners, and emergency management professionals seeking to improve the resilience of interconnected health and transportation systems. All documentation required for use of the data set is included in the Data Report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTexas Advanced Computing CenterFrench-language works237,207