MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electric vehicle charging decisions with travel distance: novel clustering algorithm integrating spatial-temporal charging and trip data

2025· article· en· W7103991121 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCity of ReginaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSaskPower
KeywordsCluster analysisElectric vehicleBattery (electricity)Range (aeronautics)Battery electric vehicleBattery capacityk-means clustering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adoption of electric vehicles (EV) plays a crucial role in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and decreasing reliance on fossil fuels. This realization requires a comprehensive comprehension of EV travel distances and charging decisions in different climates to enhance infrastructure and policy optimization. This study proposed that by clustering travel trip and charging characteristics, such as trip distances and battery levels, it would be possible to identify unique behavioral patterns that connecting charging preferences on traveling distance and charging decisions. These patterns could then be used to design and plan customized electric vehicle infrastructure. In this study, we developed a novel clustering methodology known as Novel DEC VAE Clustering Cuckoo Search K-Means (DVAE-CSKM) algorithm with a customized loss function to examine patterns on travel distances and charging decisions for electric and hybrid vehicles (HV) in cold and warm months, respectively. The case study data spans from April 2021 to April 2022 and includes over 328,000 charging events and 95,000 trip logs collected from EV and hybrid vehicle users. In comparison to conventional methods, the DVAE-CSKM algorithm achieved substantial improvements in clustering quality, with silhouette scores increasing by 23.83 % to 39.5 % across vehicle types and seasons. The analysis resolved four distinct charging behavior patterns: Frequent Short-Distance Travelers, Long-Haul Travelers, Range Extenders, and Urban Commuters, each displaying clear seasonal variation. These findings indicate that the development of seasonally adaptive, user-user-oriented charging infrastructure is critical for supporting broader EV adoption and ensuring the long-term sustainability of transportation systems. • Multi-dimensional clustering of integrated spatial, temporal, charge, and travel data for a holistic view of EV/HV behaviors. • Novel deep unsupervised machine learning is used to cluster EV/HV behavior with multi-dimensional seasonal charge–travel data. • Novel algorithm shows up to 39.5% improvement in validation score using a custom loss function based on features' importance. • Distinct clusters identified: frequent short-distance, long-haul, range extenders, and urban commuters with seasonal behaviors. • Clustering results aid strategic charger placement, infrastructure planning, energy management, and EV adoption policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied EnergySame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207