MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104018442 · doi:10.12795/ph.2025.v39.i02.12

Prue Shaw (Ed.): Dante Alighieri Commedia. A Digital Edition. Segunda edición. Florencia: Fondazione Ezio Franceschini, Inkless Editions, Saskatoon, 2021. ISBN: 1-904628-21-4

2025· article· W7104018442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilologia hispalensis · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital humanitiesContext (archaeology)Digital cultureDigital literacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta reseña analiza la segunda edición digital de la Commedia de Dante dirigida por Prue Shaw. Evalúa las mejoras en la visualización de manuscritos y variantes textuales y describe la importancia del proyecto para la filología informática y la conservación digital. Se presentan las metodologías ecdóticas, el criterio de selección de manuscritos y los sistemas tecnológicos implementados, así como los retos que afronta la edición digital crítica en el contexto contemporáneo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilologia hispalensisSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207