MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104032756 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2025.3619571

Quantum Method of Calculating Multiport S-Parameter Magnitudes Based on FEM for Microwave Components: An HHL Framework

2025· article· W7104032756 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuantum computerFinite element methodQuantumQuantum algorithmQuantum phase estimation algorithmMicrowaveQuantum circuitField (mathematics)Quantum informationElectromagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum computing in the electromagnetic (EM) field represents a transformative frontier with significant potential for advancement. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of quantum computing for solving waveguide mode problems, solving finite element method (FEM) equations for EM problems, and scaling the FEM solution. Among these applications, the Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) algorithm is an algorithm with large quantum advantages and has attracted attention. However, existing quantum methods remain constrained by the problem that the quantum-based FEM solution only obtains electric field magnitude and lacks phase information. The lack of phase information results in the inability to solve an important characteristic of EM problems: scattering parameters (S-parameters). To address the above issue, this work proposes a novel quantum method of calculating multiport S-parameter magnitudes based on FEM and HHL algorithm for microwave components. The proposed method introduces novel mathematical formulations optimized for quantum architectures. To streamline the quantum computation process and avoid the need for multiple quantum circuit simulations for each S-parameter, we design an integrated quantum circuit capable of computing magnitudes of all multiport S-parameters within a single execution. Furthermore, a specific matrix-scaling method is also developed to simplify the proposed circuits. The specific matrix-scaling method is used to improve the condition of the FEM matrix and reduce the complexity of the designed quantum circuits. The proposed method is validated using two microwave structures, demonstrating how our proposed quantum method computes S-parameter magnitudes in practical EM applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207