MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104041352 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17523482

The VAKIETA Communication Intelligence Model: A Multimodal Framework for Linguistic, Tonal, and Motivational Alignment

2025· article· en· W7104041352 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsForming Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferenceModels of communicationHuman communicationSelection (genetic algorithm)Tone (literature)Adaptation (eye)Nonverbal communicationCommunication theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The VAKIETA Communication Intelligence Model introduces an applied framework for decoding and aligning human communication across seven measurable dimensions: Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) perception; Inference versus Explicit (IE) processing; Toward versus Away (TA) motivation; and the Tone and Emotion (T/E) delivery layer. By integrating linguistic, psychological, and acoustic signals into a single explainable model, VAKIETA enables both humans and machines to interpret intent with greater fidelity. This paper defines the theoretical basis, conceptual architecture, and potential applications of the VAKIETA engine, situating it as the first practical implementation of Communication Intelligence (ComIQ)—the emerging discipline focused on analyzing not just what people say, but how and why they say it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207