MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104179300 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2025.9.010

Educational tourism and smart information and communication technologies (ICT) in geoparks: a behavioural framework for enhancing visitor experience

2025· article· en· W7104179300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyTourismVisitor patternConceptual frameworkConceptual modelFunction (biology)GeoparkInformation technologyUnified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the age of digital transformation, intelligent information and communication technologies (ICT) has become essential to tourism; yet, its function in geopark-based educational tourism has not been well examined. This research examines the Ciletuh–Palabuhanratu UNESCO global geopark to analyze how tourists use smart ICT for education on geoheritage and sustainability. A contextual and adaptable conceptual model is provided, enhancing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology version 2 (UTAUT2) framework by integrating two new constructs, perceived learning value (PLV) and geo-heritage engagement (GHE), as well as two moderating variables, educational level and digital experience. A thorough literature assessment and bibliometric analysis revealed research gaps concerning the incorporation of educational components in technology uptake within geoparks. The results demonstrate that dimensions including performance anticipation, hedonic motivation, and habit are primary determinants of behavioral intention, whereas PLV and GHE substantially improve user engagement and learning outcomes. Furthermore, educational background and digital experience attenuate the impact of fundamental structures on technology adoption. The suggested approach enhances theoretical comprehension by situating UTAUT2 within educational tourism and offers practical guidance for developing inclusive, engaging, and sustainable ICT applications. These findings provide essential direction for geopark administrators and policymakers in advancing digital learning initiatives that foster cultural appreciation, environmental consciousness, and community engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicGeotourism and Geoheritage ConservationFrench-language works237,207