MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104268251 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17542511

Survey on Customer Behavior Data Analysis for Product Purchasing

2025· article· W7104268251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsSciencetech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasingProduct (mathematics)Context (archaeology)Consumer behaviourData collectionResource (disambiguation)New product developmentVoice of the customerCustomer intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Product Sales Dataset is a comprehensive collection of sales data for a wide range of products available on the E-commerce e-commerce platform. This kind of dataset provides invaluable insights into customer behavior, product performance, and market trends, making it an essential resource for data analysis, market research, and business strategy development. This dataset is indispensable for market research, allowing businesses to discern market trends, consumer preferences, and competitive landscapes. This paper presents a comprehensive approach to customer behavior analysis and predictive modelling within the context of supermarket retail. This paper finds techniques that extract patterns in shopping data for the learning and prediction of user preference. This work list different proposed models with techniques. Paper has list various evaluation parameters of user purchase prediction models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it