MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104269032 · doi:10.25077/jrs.21.1.29-44.2025

PEMODELAN NUMERIK FONDASI DANGKAL DI ATAS TANAH LEMPUNG YANG DIPENGARUH BEBAN DINAMIK

2025· article· W7104269032 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Rekayasa Sipil (JRS-Unand) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaunch vehicleRange (aeronautics)Reentry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gempa bumi merupakan bencana alam yang sulit diprediksi dan dicegah. Selain itu, gempa bumi dapat menimbulkan tekanan tambahan dan kehancuran infrastruktur. Gerakan tanah yang ditimbulkan oleh gempa bumi harus diperhitungkan ketika merancang bangunan, khususnya untuk struktur geoteknik seperti fondasi. Fondasi sangat penting dalam mendukung bangunan atas. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan penelitian terhadap fondasi yang terkena beban gempa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh beban dinamis yang bersumber dari gerakan tanah, secara bervariasi, yang dikenai fondasi dangkal dengan Analisis Respon Situs Non Linier dengan Metode Numerik. Gerakan tanah yang digunakan berdasarkan data yang tercatat di Jepang (2007), Taiwan (1999), dan Italia (1980). Selain itu, lapisan tanahnya terdiri dari lempung homogen dengan tiga konsistensi yaitu lunak, sedang, dan keras yang dimodelkan dengan material Hardening-Soil Small. Penelitian kami mencakup pengamatan deformasi dan waktu yang menunjukkan terjadinya gerakan tanah terbesar. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa deformasi tertinggi, baik vertikal maupun horizontal, terjadi pada tanah lunak. Gempa Taiwan menghasilkan deformasi horizontal tertinggi dibandingkan gempa lainnya. Namun, deformasi vertikal tertinggi dihasilkan oleh gerakan tanah pada gempa Italia. Berdasarkan hasil intensitas arias terlihat bahwa durasi gempa antara 10% hingga 90% adalah lebih dari 9 detik untuk seluruh gempa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Rekayasa Sipil (JRS-Unand)Same topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207