MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104277439 · doi:10.60940/itemn79id9900255

Biblioteca a quatre mans

2025· article· ca· W7104277439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortugueseWork (physics)TourismQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Els últims anys moltes biblioteques escolars han viscut processos d’abandonament i posteriors accions de recuperació. En aquest article s’exposa, a partir d’aportacions de qui ho ha viscut en primera persona, la tasca que han de dur a terme docents, com les coordinadores i els membres de la comissió de la biblioteca escolar. Accions que van des de la necessària esporga de llibres fins a la meditada compra de material bibliogràfic, la posterior catalogació, el manteniment o la seva difusió per tota la comunitat educativa. La reflexió dels qui han viscut aquesta experiència ens ha transmès el que passa a moltes biblioteques escolars: existeix la ineludible dicotomia entre les tasques físiques i les pròpiament pedagògiques, la planificació és imprescindible per avançar i la manca d’hores esdevé una barrera que se supera amb creativitat i col·laboracions altruistes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it