MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104280121 · doi:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250394

Breeding report of a new seedling guava variety Suisuihong No. 1

2025· article· zh· W7104280121 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPsidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRootstockSeedlingTrunkAromaCrown (dentistry)Grafting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suisuihong No. 1 guava is a new variety cultivated from the local red-fleshed guava seedlings in Guangzhou. In 2002, an excellent guava resource with green skin, red meat, tender slippery texture and strong aroma was found from Zengcheng District of Guangzhou City, and then it was sowed and propagated. In 2007, the seedlings were planted in the field of Jiufo Base of Guangzhou Institute of Fruit Science. Combined with flavor, taste and other indicators, the top three plants were identified as the primary excellent plants through comprehensive quality analysis. In 2008, the scions were taken from the mother tree V0 for cutting, and a batch of cutting seedlings were obtained in 2010. Through field observation and analysis, it was found that the traits and quality of the cutting offspring (V1) were consistent with those of the mother tree (V0). In 2017, the scion was collected from the offspring of V1, and the pearl guava seedlings were used as rootstocks for high grafting (V2 generation). After continuous years of multi-generation grafting, it was found that the grafted offspring could still maintain the excellent genetic traits of the parent tree (V0). In 2017, it was named Suisuihong No. 1 guava. The trunk of this variety is yellowish brown, smooth, and upright with strong growth potential, open tree shape, and scaly bark. The trunk is 36 cm high, the trunk circumference is 33.6 cm, the tree height is 2.15 m, and the crown width is 2.11 m×2.03 m. The new shoots are green, four-edged, and rounded after ripening. New leaves are light green, mature leaves are dark green, single leaf, opposite and oblong, and young branches are densely pilose, then glabrous, and grayish brown lusterless. Flowers are solitary or 2-3 aggregated, being complete flowers; the receptacle is yellow-green, petals are imbricate arranged and white; filaments are slender; the calyx is green, bell-shaped or pear-shaped, and persistent. The average fruit weight is 229.3 g, and the fruit shape index is 1.27. The peel is yellow-green and shiny; the flesh is light red and loose. The number of seeds is medium, irregular, medium hardness, and light yellow; the taste is sweet and the aroma is light. The soluble solids content is 10.50%, the soluble sugar content is 6.87 g·100 g-1, the vitamin C content is 136.2 mg·100 g-1, the total acid content is 2.31 g·kg-1, and the quality is excellent. The flowering rate of this variety reaches 100% in the second year after high grafting, and it begins to enter the full fruit period in the fourth year. It takes 70-90 days from flowering to fruit ripening in summer, and 110-130 days from flowering to fruit ripening in winter. The fruit ripening period is from mid-August to mid-September, and from late December to late April. Before planting, sufficient organic fertilizer should be applied, and after planting, fertilizer and water management should be strengthened to achieve timely flower thinning, fruit thinning and pest control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.449
GPT teacher head0.644
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPsidium guajava Extracts and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207