MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104280121 · doi:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250394

Breeding report of a new seedling guava variety Suisuihong No. 1

2025· article· zh· W7104280121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPsidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRootstockSeedlingTrunkAromaCrown (dentistry)Grafting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suisuihong No. 1 guava is a new variety cultivated from the local red-fleshed guava seedlings in Guangzhou. In 2002, an excellent guava resource with green skin, red meat, tender slippery texture and strong aroma was found from Zengcheng District of Guangzhou City, and then it was sowed and propagated. In 2007, the seedlings were planted in the field of Jiufo Base of Guangzhou Institute of Fruit Science. Combined with flavor, taste and other indicators, the top three plants were identified as the primary excellent plants through comprehensive quality analysis. In 2008, the scions were taken from the mother tree V0 for cutting, and a batch of cutting seedlings were obtained in 2010. Through field observation and analysis, it was found that the traits and quality of the cutting offspring (V1) were consistent with those of the mother tree (V0). In 2017, the scion was collected from the offspring of V1, and the pearl guava seedlings were used as rootstocks for high grafting (V2 generation). After continuous years of multi-generation grafting, it was found that the grafted offspring could still maintain the excellent genetic traits of the parent tree (V0). In 2017, it was named Suisuihong No. 1 guava. The trunk of this variety is yellowish brown, smooth, and upright with strong growth potential, open tree shape, and scaly bark. The trunk is 36 cm high, the trunk circumference is 33.6 cm, the tree height is 2.15 m, and the crown width is 2.11 m×2.03 m. The new shoots are green, four-edged, and rounded after ripening. New leaves are light green, mature leaves are dark green, single leaf, opposite and oblong, and young branches are densely pilose, then glabrous, and grayish brown lusterless. Flowers are solitary or 2-3 aggregated, being complete flowers; the receptacle is yellow-green, petals are imbricate arranged and white; filaments are slender; the calyx is green, bell-shaped or pear-shaped, and persistent. The average fruit weight is 229.3 g, and the fruit shape index is 1.27. The peel is yellow-green and shiny; the flesh is light red and loose. The number of seeds is medium, irregular, medium hardness, and light yellow; the taste is sweet and the aroma is light. The soluble solids content is 10.50%, the soluble sugar content is 6.87 g·100 g-1, the vitamin C content is 136.2 mg·100 g-1, the total acid content is 2.31 g·kg-1, and the quality is excellent. The flowering rate of this variety reaches 100% in the second year after high grafting, and it begins to enter the full fruit period in the fourth year. It takes 70-90 days from flowering to fruit ripening in summer, and 110-130 days from flowering to fruit ripening in winter. The fruit ripening period is from mid-August to mid-September, and from late December to late April. Before planting, sufficient organic fertilizer should be applied, and after planting, fertilizer and water management should be strengthened to achieve timely flower thinning, fruit thinning and pest control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.449
GPT teacher head0.644
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it