MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104391789 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v20i1.76681

The Involutive Double Coset Property for String C-groups of Affine Type

2025· article· W7104391789 on OpenAlexafffundvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoxeter groupCosetAffine transformationType (biology)Property (philosophy)String (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we complete the classification of infinite affine Coxeter group types with the property that every double coset relative to the first parabolic subgroup is represented by an involution. This involutive double coset property was established earlier for the Coxeter groups of type $\tilde{C}_2$ and $\tilde{G}_2$, we complete the classification by showing it also holds for type $\tilde{F}_4$ and the types $\tilde{C}_n$ for all $n$. As this property is inherited by all string $C$-groups of these types, it follows that the corresponding abstract regular polytopes will have polyhedral realization cones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207