MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104393363 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v19i4.71818

A different approach to Gauss Fibonacci polynomials

2025· article· W7104393363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibonacci numberFibonacci polynomialsGaussOrder (exchange)Lucas numberOrthogonal polynomialsRecurrence relationMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper with the help of higher order Fibonacci polynomials, we introduce higher order Gauss Fibonacci polynomials that generalize the Gauss Fibonacci polynomials studied by Özkan and Taştan. We give a recurrence relation, Binet-like formula, generating and exponential generating functions, summation formula for the higher order Gauss Fibonacci polynomials. Moreover, we give two special matrices that we call $Q^{(s)}(x)$ and $P^{(s)}(x),$ respectively. From these matrices, we obtain a matrix representation and derive the Cassini's identity of higher order Gauss Fibonacci polynomials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207