MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104456890 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17556483

Spectral-Multiplicative Optimization Framework

2025· dissertation· en· W7104456890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicOptimization problemMultiplicative functionConvergence (economics)Constrained optimizationGlobal optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectral-Multiplicative Framework for Enterprise-Scale Constraint Optimization Abstract This archive contains the complete implementation and validation suite of a novel spectral-multiplicative optimization framework that bridges heat-kernel spectral theory with number-theoretic constraint encoding. The system achieves O(nnz) complexity for graphs exceeding 100,000 nodes while maintaining ρ ≥ 0.99 correlation between spectral action and multiplicative penalties. Key innovations include: (1) DEFEKT diagnostics for quantifying inherent optimization limits via variance floor analysis; (2) multiplicative prime-weight constraint encoding derived from Bost-Connes system truncation; (3) neural-adaptive weight calibration; and (4) real-time correlation guarding during simulated annealing. Validated across 17+ problem domains including cloud resource allocation, SAT solving (92.5% solvability prediction accuracy), and multi-type graph partitioning. This implementation provides the first computationally verified demonstration of Bost-Connes truncation convergence to ζ(β) with sub-1% error using finite prime sets. Description This package implements a unified optimization framework that addresses the fundamental limitation of traditional spectral methods: their inability to preserve global spectral invariants while enforcing local constraints. The core innovation treats constraint satisfaction as a problem in spectral arithmetic—encoding discrete constraints using multiplicative structures derived from prime number theory, specifically the Euler product representation of the Riemann zeta function. The framework is built upon the Bost-Connes quantum statistical mechanical system (Bost & Connes, 1995), which we demonstrate can be computationally truncated to finite prime sets while preserving ζ(β) convergence properties. This theoretical foundation distinguishes our approach from heuristic constraint weighting: constraints are not arbitrary penalties but Euler factors in a partition function whose limiting behavior is mathematically characterized. This framework represents the first computationally validated bridge between: Analytic number theory (Bost-Connes system truncation) Spectral geometry (heat kernel methods) Statistical mechanics (entropy-constrained optimization) Enterprise-scale systems (100K+ node optimization) Unlike traditional spectral partitioners (METIS, KaHIP), our multiplicative constraint encoding preserves global spectral invariants while enabling local violation penalization with provable correlation guarantees. The DEFEKT diagnostics provide the first quantitative feasibility assessment for NP-hard partitioning problems, transforming optimization from art to science. Applications and Impact Primary Domains: Cloud infrastructure: Resource allocation, cost optimization Supply chain: Manufacturing and distribution network partitioning Telecom: Network slicing with SLA constraints Social networks: Influence graph analysis with contiguity requirements High-performance computing: HPC/cloud workload placement Theoretical Impact: Validates Bost-Connes truncation computationally for finite prime systems Introduces spectral-multiplicative duality as optimization invariant Establishes variance floor analysis as practical complexity metric 9. Technical Requirements Runtime: Crystal >= 1.8, < 2.0 Memory: 512 MB minimum; 4 GB+ recommended for large problems OS: Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+), macOS, Windows via WSL Dependencies: None (pure Crystal implementation) Citation and Attribution If you use this framework in your research or commercial applications, please cite: @software{SpectralMultiplicativeFramework2025, author = {Iyer, Sethu}, title = {{Spectral-Multiplicative Framework: Heat-Kernel Constraint Partitioning Engine}}, year = {2025}, publisher = {Zenodo}, version = {0.1.0}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.17556483}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17556483}, license = {CC-BY-4.0} } License This implementation is released under: Code: Apache License 2.0(permissive, industry-compatible, allows modification) Documentation, write-ups, and examples: CC-BY- 4.0(non-commercial academic use allowed) Commercial use: This framework is fully usable under the CC-BY license. If you want expert guidance, collaboration, or a commercial consultation, feel free to reach out on X (@sureihty). Keywords spectral graph theory, constraint optimization, Bost-Connes system, Euler product, DEFEKT diagnostics, prime-weight encoding, heat kernel methods, simulated annealing, sparse matrix operations, enterprise scalability, variance floor analysis, multiplicative constraints, neural weight adaptation, correlation guard, NP-hard partitioning, cloud optimization, SAT solving References Bost, J.-B., & Connes, A. (1995). "Hecke Algebras, Type III Factors and Phase Transitions with Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Number Theory." Selecta Mathematica, 1(3), 411-457. Connes, A., & Marcolli, M. (2006). Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives. American Mathematical Society. Fiedler, M. (1973). "Algebraic Connectivity of Graphs." Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 23(2), 298-305. Chung, F. R. (1997). Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society. Naumov, M., & Moon, T. (2016). "Parallel Spectral Graph Partitioning." NVIDIA Technical Report. Alon, N., & Milman, V. D. (1985). "λ₁, isoperimetric inequalities for graphs, and superconcentrators." Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 38(1), 73-88. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). "Optimization by Simulated Annealing." Science, 220(4598), 671-680. Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2004). The Cross-Entropy Method: A Unified Approach to Combinatorial Optimization. Springer. Version: 0.1.0Release Date: 2025-11-08

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207