I <3 Sorel ; suivi de Monologue et échec de la communication dans Billy [les jours de hurlement] de Fabien Cloutier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les nouvelles modalités d’énonciation explorées par le théâtre contemporain remettent en question la notion traditionnelle de dialogue. L’usage plus extensif du monologue, souvent considéré à tort comme s’inscrivant à l’opposé du dialogue et utilisé avec parcimonie dans le théâtre classique, conquiert la scène autant au Québec qu’à l’international et instaure un nouveau rapport entre la scène et la salle. Le volet création, I Sorel, explore comment trois solitudes se rencontrent sans se parler à travers un lieu partagé et par le jeu des croisements entre les monologues. Inspirée par l’art japonais du kintsugi, la pièce cherche à dévoiler la beauté des fissures et des imperfections de la langue, des lieux et des gens. L’essai porte sur l’usage singulier qui est fait des monologues au sein de Billy [les jours de hurlement] et en interroge les modalités et les effets sur l’élaboration de l’action dramatique et sur la construction du rapport au spectateur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".