MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Live Not by Post-Truth : An Uncanny American Fascination with Eastern European Dissent

2025· article· W7104536987 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKWI-Blog · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUncannyDissentUncanny valleyNarrative

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary contestations of truth have led some to diagnose our age as one of "post-truth".In her 2017 essay, Marci Shore -a US historian who has recently fled the Trump administration for Canada -remembers the words of the Czech dissident and later president, Vclav Havel: "Live in truth".1This time, however, this dictum is not used as a defence against omnipresent "communist lies", but rather as an anchor in the era of "post-truth", supposedly dominated by the lies of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.On the other side of the political spectrum, Rod Dreher, a US columnist and a writer with links to the Danube Institute, a Budapest-based think tank serving the transnational neoconservative network, invokes the spirit of the Eastern European dissent in his 2020 book Live Not by Lies.2 Dreher turns to Havel's concept of a life in truth as an antidote to the "progressivism" of contemporary liberal elites whose "soft totalitarianism" of social justice supposedly denies the existence of objective truth in favour of dissecting power relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it