MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104575128 · doi:10.36615/7c7mtq26

Decoloniality/Decolonization in the Twenty-First Century

2025· article· en· W7104575128 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Thinker · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversidad de CórdobaUniversidad de Buenos Aires
KeywordsReading (process)Key (lock)GloomPoint (geometry)Theme (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We would like to share with you, in the mood of introductory remarks on this special issue, some of the points we made in the letter we sent inviting contributions. We would like to share with you some of the key issues underscored in the letter, so that you can become a participant reader reflecting on your own take on colonialism/coloniality as well as decolonization/decoloniality. It’s an invitation engage your own reflections of what is or would have been your take when reading the contribution to this volume, if you feel like expressing your own perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it