MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104628314 · doi:10.5683/sp3/mbt82v

Knock Knock, who's there? Identifying wild species-specific fish sounds with passive acoustic localization and random forest models

2025· dataset· W7104628314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterBioacousticsFish <Actinopterygii>Natural soundsSound (geography)Random forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset accompanies a publication that identifies wild rocky reef fish sounds from British Columbia, Canada using a passive acoustic localization array paired with underwater video. We localized fish sounds using cross correlation of acoustic transients and time difference of arrival. We manually matched sound coordinates to specific fish species from underwater video. We then extracted 47 sound features from each fish call to identify species-specific fish sounds using random forest models. We identified fish calls for eight fish species. Representative sound clips for each species are included in the repository folder fish_sound_audio_samples. We have also include our full dataset and all R and python scripts we used to analyze and visualize our data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207