Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acicnemis nobilis Hubenthal, 1919 Figs 6 J 1–6, 2, 21 Type material examined (Taiwan: 10). Holotype. Taiwan • Hoozan, “ H. Sauter 1910 ”, bears small yellow label reading “ 1911 14 ”, bears red label reading “ Typus ”, SNSD. Non-type material. Taiwan • Penpuchi, Nantou Hs., 13. VII. 1966, H. Sasaji (2, KUM), JHL_SYN_151 (dissected male), JHL_AREV_492; • Sangkang, Nantou Hs., 14. VII. 1966, H. Sasaji (3, KUM), JHL_SYN_150 (dissected male), JHL_AREV_491, JHL_AREV_493; • Lushan, Nantou Hsein, 8. VI. 1976, H. Makihara (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_494; • Nanshanchi, Wenchuan Hs., 27. IV. – 4. V. 1977, T. Mikage (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_495; • Hsi-Leng, 3. V. 1981, S. Tsuyuki (1, TUA), JHL_AREV_496; • Kaohsiung, 5. VIII. 1978, T. Niisato (1, TUA), JHL_AREV_497. Diagnosis. Body length 4.1–5.2 mm. Covered in dark gray and black scales, with a pale-yellow scale, V-shaped, transverse band across middle of elytra. Basal patch of black scales surrounding scutellum approx. V-shaped and extending prominently onto the second elytral intervals (as opposed to the similar A. nohirai which has an elongate I-shaped patch of black scales on the first elytral interval that barely extends on the second elytral interval basally). Pronotum lacking impunctate longitudinal midline (present in A. koguma). Scutellum covered in pale scales. Elytra with erect scales only on odd intervals. Sclerolepidia distinct and protruding. Third tarsomeres distinctly emarginate. Pedon with lateral edges approx. parallel in dorsal view, but sinuating into a blunt, rounded point. Internal sac protruding from aedeagus, with roughened musculature posteriorly and a club-shaped sclerotized structure anteriorly at its apex (Fig. 6 J 1 – 2). Distribution. This species is currently only known from Taiwan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".