Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acicnemis sauteri Hubenthal, 1919 Figs 1, 6O 1–6, 2, 26 Type material examined (Japan: 21; Taiwan: 18; Total: 39). Lectotype (designated here). Taiwan • Hoozan, 1910, H. Sauter, bears a red label reading “ Typus ” and a new, red lectotype label reading “ LECTOTYPE / Acicnemis sauteri / Hubenthal, 1919 / Det. Lewis & Kojima, 2025 ”, SNSD, JHL_ACITAI_004. Paralectotypes. Taiwan • Hoozan, “ 08–10 ”, Sauter (3, SDEI), bear a red label reading “ Syntypus ”, SDEI Muncheberg Col 18573, 18574, 18583; • Kosempo, Sauter (4, SDEI), bear a red label reading “ Syntypus ”, SDEI Muncheberg Col 18575, 18576, 18577, 18578; • Fuhosho, “ VIII- 09 ”, Sauter (3, SDEI), bear a red label reading “ Syntypus ”, SDEI Muncheberg Col 18580, 18581, 18582; • Taihorinsho, “ X- 09 ”, Sauter (1, SDEI), bears a red label reading “ Syntypus ”, SDEI Muncheberg Col 18579. Non-type material. Taiwan • Lushan Wenchuan, Nantou Hsien, 6–7. VI. 1976, H. Makihara (2, KUM), JHL_AREV_609, JHL_AREV_611; • Sun Moon Lake, Nantou Hsien, 6. XII. 2013, J. Aoki (10, KUM), JHL_SYN_148 (dissected male), JHL_SYN_149 (dissected male), JHL_AREV_613 – JHL_AREV_620; • Wukongshan, Liu-kuei, Kaohsiung Hsein, 2. V. 1996, H. Takizawa (1, HUM), JHL_ACITAI_085; Japan: Kagoshima Prefecture: • Nakanoshima Island, 25–30. IV. 1975, H. Irie (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_608; • Jinushi-daimyojin, Satomura, Nakano-jima Island, 7–9. VII. 2019, S. Imada (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_610; • Sato, Nakano-jima Island, 7–9. VII. 2019, N. Tsuji (3, KUM), JHL_AREV_691 – JHL_AREV_693; • Aden, Kikai-jima Island, 6. V. 2022, R. Ito (3, KUM), JHL_AREV_623, JHL_AREV_908, JHL_AREV_909; • Kikai-jima Island, 4. III. 2012, J. Aoki (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_695; • Torigamine, Amami-Oshima, 3. VIII. 1976, N. Morishima (1, LBM), LBM 5123; • Hatsuno, Amami-Oshima, 24–30. VI. 1973, M. Ito (1 dissected male, LBM), LBM 5132; • Sumiyo, Amami Oshima, 27. V. 2004, K. Takahashi (1, KUM), JHL_AREV_694; • Akuseki-jima Island, Ue-shuraku, Sakamori-jinja, 2–6. VII. 2019, S. Imada (1, KUM), JHL_DNA_121 (GenBank accession number: PV 255642); • Nakano-jima Island, Satomura, Jinushi-daimyojin, 7–9. VII. 2019, S. Imada (1, KUM), JHL_DNA_120 (GenBank accession number: PV 255641). Diagnosis. Body length 4.9–6.2 mm. Covered in pale and dark brown scales, with two obliquely shaped white, black-bordered spots across middle of elytra. Pronotum lacking impunctate longitudinal midline (present in A. koguma). Scutellum small, bordered by pale yellow scales, and weakly bare antero-dorsally (compare with A. kiotoensis which possesses a large, broad, bare scutellum). Odd and 2 nd elytral intervals with erect scales (4 th elytral interval also occasionally with 1–2 scales near white spot). Sclerolepidia indistinct, forming low, rounded, non-protruding tubercles. Third tarsomeres emarginate (as opposed to truncate, as in A. koguma). Pedon with lateral edges approx. parallel in dorsal view, but converging in distal 1 / 2 evenly into a blunt point. Pedon elongate (pedon length / total aedeagus length including temo = 0.26). Internal sac protruding and unmodified in the posterior 1 / 2, but with roughened musculature in anterior 1 / 2 (Fig. 6 O 1 – 2). Distribution. This species occurs in southern Japan (Kagoshima Prefecture) and Taiwan, and has also been recorded from South Korea (Alonso-Zarazaga et al. 2023). The apparent lack of this species in the southern Ryukyu Islands (Okinawa Prefecture) is odd; however, similar patterns are known in other weevils (e. g., Aphanerostethus magnus Lewis & Kojima, 2024) Remarks. This species is closely allied with A. maculaalba (see Remarks for that species). We designate one of Hubenthal’s syntypes (SNSD, JHL _ACITAI_004) as a lectotype to fix the identity of this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".