MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7104658089 · doi:10.5327/cbn240417

Cognitive impairment following leptospirosis encephalitis: case report and literature review

2024· article· W7104658089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicLeptospirosis research and findings
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncephalitisLeptospirosisEpilepsyDeliriumStatus epilepticusLevel of consciousnessHeadachesGlasgow Coma ScalePhenytoinStupor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Case presentation: A 67-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital after episodes of epileptic seizures and mental confusion. She reported anxiety, disorientation, and headaches for the past 15 days. On initial examination, she was confused, drowsy, with signs of meningeal irritation. The cranial nerves were preserved. No alteration in strength or reflexes were found. Glasgow score was 13. A cranial MRI revealed extensive areas of T2/FLAIR hypersignal, severe microangiopathy, and pial enhancement by contrast in the right temporo-parieto-occipital region, in addition to positive Ig M serology for leptospirosis. She was treated with ampicillin and sulbactam. On the 3rd day of admission, there was a worsening of consciousness level, recurrent epileptic seizures, hyponatremia, and worsening renal function, leading to orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation for status epilepticus treatment. After 30 days hospitalized, she showed clinical and neurological improvement and was discharged with phenytoin and levetiracetam medication. Prior to hospitalization, she used lithium and sertraline to treat her bipolar affective disorder (BAD) diagnosed in her youth. After discharge, she began to presente cognitive complaints. During the neurologist consultation, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test was 18 out of 30 points. The diagnostic hypothesis was multifactorial cognitive impairment secondary to deterioration of BAD associated with sequelae of leptospirosis encephalitis and vascular lesions. Discussion: Encephalitis is an acute inflammation of the central nervous system (CNS), specifically of the brain parenchyma, often caused by viruses such as influenza, herpes simplex, arboviruses, and in endemic areas like Brazil, dengue, Zika and Chikungunya viruses can also be pathogenic agents. Less commonly, bacterial pathogens such as Leptospira species can lead to this clinical manifestation. Leptospirosis is a zoonosis of significant global concern, prevalent in tropical climates and associated with lower economic levels. The disease is transmitted through contact of an open wound with the urine of the transmitting animal and can manifest in various clinical forms, although neurological presentation is uncommon (about 10-15% of Leptospirosis cases). The CNS can be affected by this zoonosis either through direct infection of the brain parenchyma or secondarily through hepatorenal involvement. This CNS involvement may manifest as meningitis or encephalitis. Final comments: Therefore, due to encephalitis being a medical emergency and this manifestation of Leptospirosis being considered rare, many physicians may not consider this possibility and may mismanage the patient or even miss the appropriate time to start treatment to prevent more severe sequelae. It is essential that, especially in the most prevalent areas of this significant zoonosis, this clinical manifestation must be adequately investigated and treated promptly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArquivos de Neuro-PsiquiatriaSame topicLeptospirosis research and findingsFrench-language works237,207