MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7104874834 · doi:10.5683/sp3/cant7q

Biochar greatly enhances methane oxidation in urban green roof substrate

2025· dataset· W7104874834 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreen roofMethaneBiocharCarbon dioxideRoofSubstrate (aquarium)Water vapor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Filename: merged_sedum.csv: This dataset contains long-term field measurements of greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from extensive Sedum green roof modules located at the University of Toronto, collected between 2020 and 2024. The experiment investigated the effects of biochar amendment (20 t ha⁻¹; ~5% v/v) on methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and water vapor (H₂O) fluxes, as well as associated substrate properties. Data were collected using static chambers connected to a LGR (Los Gatos Research) cavity ring-down spectrometer, representing one of the first multi-year assessments of CH₄ fluxes from urban green roof systems. Filename: sedum_flux_2020_2024:This dataset includes multi-year measurements of methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and water vapor (H₂O) fluxes from Sedum green roof modules in Toronto, Canada, collected between 2020 and 2024. The experiment quantified seasonal greenhouse gas (GHG) dynamics under different substrate treatments, including biochar-amended and organic control plots. Fluxes were measured with static chambers connected to a Picarro G2508 cavity ring-down spectrometer, following standard GHG chamber protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→