Symptomatologie du trouble de personnalité limite chez les adolescents suivis par les services de protection de la jeunesse et les services de santé mentale de première ligne = Borderline personality disorder symptomatology among adolescents involved with youth protection services and first-line mental health services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate differences in the severity and symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) according to sex and service context among adolescents involved with youth protection services (YPS) and first-line mental health services (FLMHS) in Quebec. A total of 45 adolescents (14 to 17 years old) with BPD traits were recruited from YPS (n=35) and CLSCs (n=10). The Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) measured the severity of symptomatology while the Life Problems Inventory (LPI) evaluated the intensity of BPD. Independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze group differences. Analyses revealed that girls had significantly higher mean symptom severity scores (BSL-23) than boys and a significantly higher interpersonal chaos score (LPI). No other significant differences emerged from the primary analyses. Supplementary item-by-item analyses of the BSL-23 and LPI, indicated that girls endorsed several internalizing behaviours, while boys endorsed numerous externalizing behaviours. In terms of service context, the YPS group scored higher on several externalizing behaviours, while the FLMHS group scored higher on many internalizing behaviours. The results of this study provide initial insights into BPD symptomatology and severity in these understudied service contexts and can guide early detection and intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".