MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105119901 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3632208

Detection of Spatially Oriented Fusarium Head Blight Spikes in Wheat Using UAV-Based Remote Sensing Imaging

2025· article· W7105119901 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Crop AllianceSaskatchewan Wheat Development CommissionMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBounding overwatchVisibilityLimitingRemote sensing applicationPixelHyperspectral imagingObject detection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fusarium head blight (FHB) poses a critical threat to global wheat production, compromising yield and quality through mycotoxin contamination. Traditional methods, such as laboratory assays and visual inspections, are labour-intensive, costly, and impractical for large-scale monitoring. Although remote sensing based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers a promising alternative, existing approaches using axis-aligned bounding boxes (AABBs) struggle with arbitrary orientations, large aspect ratios, and dense wheat spike arrangements, limiting detection accuracy. To address these challenges, we introduce a UAV-based remote sensing framework for detecting oriented FHB-infected wheat spikes under real field conditions. We propose a novel modified hybrid YOLO architecture for detecting oriented bounding boxes (OBBs) that integrates the efficiency of YOLOv10 with YOLOv11’s orientation-aware detection capabilities. To enhance lesion visibility in UAV images, we utilize pixel-level cubic power stretching, which amplifies the contrast of FHB-infected regions while normalizing overexposed backgrounds. Experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance; for example, our Hybrid-YOLO-x achieves 93.8% mAP@0.5, surpassing YOLOv8x and YOLOv11x by 3.1% and 1.3%, respectively. It reduces parameters by 30.4% (vs. YOLOv8x) and 17.7% (vs. YOLOv11x) while lowering GFLOPs by 28.3% (vs. YOLOv8x) and 7.1% (vs. YOLOv11x). The model also achieves 67.7% mAP @ 0.5–0.95, outperforming YOLOv8x by 4.3% and YOLOv11x by 0.6%. Our hybrid model also outperforms other state-of-the-art OBB detectors, such as S<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>ANet, ROI-Transformer, R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>CNN, utilizing 12.8% fewer parameters and 5.4% lower computational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207