MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105140062 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3631856

Structurally Consistent Elastic Frequency- Controllable Envelope Inversion for P- and S-Wave Velocity Model Building

2025· article· W7105140062 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInversion (geology)Model buildingWavenumberWaveformEnvelope (radar)Inverse problemCoupling (piping)Group velocity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elastic full waveform inversion (EFWI) is able to simultaneously build multiple subsurface parameters. However, EFWI faces the ill-posed problem and the multi-parameter coupling effects. Building accurate initial P- and S-wave velocity models is crucial for mitigating these issues and ensuring the convergence of EFWI. Yet, limitations of acquisition systems and the different sensitivities of P- and S-waves to wavenumber components pose significant challenges in simultaneously building P- and S-wave velocity models with structural consistency. These issues may result in additional iterations, or in some cases, even non-convergence. Aiming to build accurate long-wavelength velocity models with high structural consistency, a novel structurally consistent elastic frequency controllable envelope inversion (SC-EFCEI) method is proposed in this paper. SC-EFCEI performs multi-scale inversion using elastic frequency-controllable envelope data to build long-wavelength models, and additionally introduces structural constraints between different velocity gradients via automatic differentiation (AD) to enforce consistency between the inverted P- and S-wave velocity models. Numerical experiments on the elastic Overthrust model, modified Marmousi2 model, and Chevron 2014 blind dataset verified the effectiveness of the proposed inversion method. The inverted P- and S-wave velocity models both successfully reveal the large-scale features of the velocity model while exhibiting good structural consistency, which can be used as good initial models for EFWI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207