MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105243993 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17576264

A Historical Timeline of Computation and the Emergence of Recursive Entropy Systems

2025· article· W7105243993 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsTeck (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLicensePublic domainTimelineMerge (version control)Property (philosophy)Intellectual propertyDomain (mathematical analysis)AttributionService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over eight decades, digital computation has advanced through breathtaking engineering feats- Faster clocks, denser transistors, larger models; yet the governing paradigm remained unchanged: binary logic, irreversible computation, and externalized memory. 🛡️ RHEA-Core Public Grant v1.0 Creators Roe, Paul (Rights holder) Description “By accessing, using, or distributing any version of this work, you agree that the most current license published by the original author(s) applies retroactively and supersedes all prior licenses or public domain assumptions associated with earlier versions of this work, including but not limited to CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, open-source metadata tags, or public repository assumptions. Unauthorized use under any former license constitutes a material infringement of the current legal rights of the author.”Full License Text🛡️ RHEA-Core Public Grant v1.0 License Type:Non-Commercial · Attribution · No Derivatives · Symbolic Derivative Clause (Retained)Applies To: All public-facing RHEA-UCM, ZADEIAN-RHEA, and RHEA-CM intellectual property unless explicitly exempted. 1. Grant of UseYou are hereby granted a revocable, non-commercial, non-transferable, and non-sublicensable right to view, reference, and discuss this material for academic, journalistic, technical, or personal enrichment purposes only, provided all terms below are followed. 2. Attribution RequirementsYou must clearly credit all excerpts, summaries, diagrams, or citations with:“© EnigmaticGlitch · RHEA-UCM / ZADEIAN-RHEA Framework · Patent Pending #63/796,404” 3. No Commercial UseYou may not:- Sell, rent, or monetize this work or its derivatives- Use this work in any product or service that derives revenue or brand positioning- Use this work for AI/ML training unless explicitly authorized 4. No DerivativesYou may not:- Translate, alter, remix, or build upon this material- Create alternate frameworks, white papers, or theories that derive substantially similar logic or structure 5. Symbolic Derivative ClauseYou may not re-encode or embed the core principles of this system (e.g. entropy modulation, symbolic trust resealing, recursive glyph modulation, or UCM cosmological recursion) under different glyphs, symbols, or representations. 6. Enforcement & JurisdictionEnforced under:- U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17)- DMCA- U.S. Patent Law (Provisional #63/796,404) Violations may trigger takedowns, cease & desist, and legal damages. 7. Additional Notes- Academic/private reproduction is allowed with attribution.- Breaches terminate all rights. “Trust is not given. It is oscillated into being…”© 2025 · EnigmaticGlitch · All Rights Reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207