Espace domestique et travail dans <i>Chez soi</i> de Mona Chollet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La représentation du travail en rapport avec l’espace domestique occupe une place primordiale dans l’essai Chez soi. Une odyssée de l’espace domestique (2015) de Mona Chollet, un texte hybride superposant des discours philosophiques et sociologiques et des témoignages personnels. À partir des paradigmes du travail d’Anthony Hussenot, chercheur français en sciences de la gestion, et de la notion d’« écriture du travail » de Dominique Viart, cet article propose une mise en évidence de certaines conceptions du travail en Occident aujourd’hui, une analyse thématique et une étude des stratégies discursives de Chez soi . L’hypothèse développée est que, dans l’essai, la figuration de pratiques de travail alternatives au domicile (lire, écrire, faire des recherches sur Internet) s’inscrit dans une démarche de création de nouveaux modes de vie et d’écriture qui remettent en question le productivisme et l’injonction à l’accélération propres aux sociétés néolibérales occidentales contemporaines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".