MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105596989 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2025.3628600

Periodic Event-Triggering Adaptive Control for Networked Uncertain Nonlinear Systems Against Actuator Attacks and Its Applications

2025· article· W7105596989 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorAdaptive controlCompensation (psychology)Controller (irrigation)Nonlinear systemServomechanismLyapunov function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a sampled-data event-triggered adaptive neural network (NN) control strategy to cope with the digital communication and attack compensation problems of networked systems with actuator attacks and exogenous disturbance. By combining event triggering state, parameter estimation signals, and disturbance observer, a novel digital state feedback controller is designed to reduce its updating frequency and compensate for the deliberate impact of unknown actuator attacks. Moreover, considering that the state is partially measurable, a novel observer-based digital controller is designed via a double-ended event-triggering mechanism (ETM). Then, two new Lyapunov functionals are created to analyze the system stability, and two design methods are given to solve the control gain. Finally, the feasibility and validity of the derived results are verified by a visual servo control system and an offshore structure system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207