Politique institutionnelle de formation et éducation à la citoyenneté à l’école primaire française
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Historiquement, la question de l’éducation à la citoyenneté est liée institutionnellement en France avec celle de la transmission des valeurs de la République et de la laïcité. Toutefois, après les événements tragiques de 2015, la France a renforcé son engagement à former les enseignants sur ces thèmes via un plan national de formation. Ce plan, qui inclut des séances en ligne et en présentiel, vise à transmettre les valeurs républicaines, mais laisse des lacunes sur le volet didactique. Cet article explore les défis qui subsistent suite à cette formation pour l’enseignement de la citoyenneté dans les écoles primaires françaises, soulignant qu’une approche éthique collective de la discussion est indispensable, mais difficile à instaurer en raison du manque de temps et des défis de l’hypermodernité. L’article propose également une réflexion sur les conditions nécessaires d’un réel pouvoir agir des équipes enseignantes pour se saisir des questions entourant l’éducation à la citoyenneté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".