MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105701740 · doi:10.24400/527896/a03-2025.4080

Using SWOT Observations to Characterize Hydrodynamics and Hydroperiod in River Deltas and Estuaries

2025· article· W7105701740 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryRiver deltaHydrology (agriculture)DischargeTidal irrigationBiogeochemical cycleTidal rangeTidal riverDelta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

River deltas and estuaries are dynamic transitional zones at the land-ocean interface where freshwater, tides, sediment, and nutrients interact, shaping ecosystems that are both ecologically rich and highly vulnerable to climate change and anthropogenic disturbance. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite mission offers unprecedented opportunities to monitor water surface elevation and hydrodynamics in these complex environments. However, extracting actionable information from SWOT’s novel Ka-band radar interferometric measurements—especially in low-slope, tidally influenced coastal regions—requires new approaches tailored to the complex geomorphology and hydrology of deltas and estuaries. In this study, we developed and applied a framework that aggregates SWOT measurements onto a delta-specific river network graphs to extract hydrodynamic parameters and validate numerical hydrodynamic models in global river deltas and estuaries. The graphs organize SWOT’s pixel cloud (PixC) data along channels to allow for a robust non-stationary harmonic analysis (i.e. NS_Tide), which reconstructs hourly tidal constituents from the sparse SWOT measurements. The tidal reconstruction is then used to validate numerical models that are further leveraged to quantify channel-wetland connectivity, which is essential for understanding how water and salinity move across deltaic landscapes. This approach captures temporal variability in tidal dynamics and enables estimation of tidal range and hydroperiod—the duration and frequency of inundation in adjacent wetlands. These parameters are critical for assessing habitat viability, salinity gradients and biogeochemical fluxes. We applied this methodology across a range of representative coastal systems, including: the Guayas River delta (Ecuador), the Komo River estuary (Gabon), the St. Lawrence estuary (Canada), the Langebaan Lagoon (South Africa), and the Mississippi River Delta (USA). These sites span a spectrum of tidal regimes, channel geometries, and wetland types, offering a comparative view of SWOT’s performance across diverse hydro-geomorphological contexts. We evaluated SWOT-derived water levels against in-situ gauges, model outputs, and ancillary remote sensing data, and we assessed the coherence of tidal signals along river-to-ocean transects. Our results demonstrate that SWOT reliably resolves tidal amplitudes and phases in most estuarine channels, enabling consistent estimation of hydroperiod in adjacent wetlands. SWOT’s performance is modulated by regional morphology, including tidal range, channel geometry, vegetation, and bathymetric complexity. SWOT’s capacity to detect water surface slopes and variations diminishes in areas with dense vegetation cover, highly fragmented marshes and narrow tidal creeks. Nevertheless, the aggregated PixC-based approach significantly enhances signal quality by reducing noise and increasing spatial-temporal sampling density. The tidal constituents extracted with NS_Tide show strong agreement with in-situ tidal observations, mostly when SWOT accuracy is significantly larger than tidal range. The approach developed here provides a robust framework for leveraging SWOT data in coastal settings, opening new possibilities for long-term monitoring productivity of coastal wetlands, and their vulnerability to sea-level rise, land subsidence, and reduced freshwater discharge, as well as for identifying thresholds where salinity intrusion may begin to impact ecosystem health and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207