MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7105738019 · doi:10.5683/sp3/sesgvf

Search Strategies: Assessment of pediatric readiness scores of emergency departments in Canada: A systematic review

2025· dataset· W7105738019 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLMEDLINECochrane LibrarySystematic reviewEmergency department

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The notes field contains the full MEDLINE search strategy for 'Assessment of pediatric readiness scores of emergency departments in Canada'. The files in this dataset contains the full MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus, and Global Health (Ovid) (2025-11-14), the PRISMA-S Checklist, and the RIS files for each database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.071
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.071
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.007
Bibliometrics0.0490.067
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→