Optimization of event selection in search for doubly-charged Higgs bosons at ATLAS using machine learning techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of proton-proton collision data recorded by ATLAS during Run 2 of the LHC identified an excess of data over the Standard Model prediction in both the $W^{\pm}Z$ and $W^{\pm}W^{\pm}$ vector boson scattering processes. These excesses could be attributed to resonances of the singly-charged ($H_5^{\pm}$) and doubly-charged ($H_5^{\pm\pm}$) Higgs bosons, which are hypothesized by the Georgi-Machacek (GM) model. To investigate this excess and assess its compatibility with the GM model, a dedicated search is being performed for the $H_5^{\pm}$ and $H_5^{\pm\pm}$ bosons where they are produced by vector boson fusion and decay to $W^{\pm}Z$ and $W^{\pm}W^{\pm}$ respectively. In this thesis, the selection of the $H_5^{\pm\pm}$ signal region is optimized by training a neural network to discriminate signal events from background events. The characteristics of the $H_5^{\pm\pm}$ events vary significantly with mass, which leads to undesired behaviour when training a single network for a large mass range. A number of strategies are devised to address this problem; the best solution is to modify the weighting of different simulated masses during training. The neural network is used to define a new $W^{\pm}W^{\pm}$ signal region which has a greater sensitivity to the GM model compared to a cuts-based approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".