MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105854389 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3630565

Multi-User Detection Under Correlated Noise With Dense Large-Scale Antenna Arrays and Low-Resolution ADCs

2025· article· W7105854389 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOversamplingTelecommunications linkNoise (video)MIMOContext (archaeology)Antenna (radio)Reduction (mathematics)Communications systemNoise powerSpatial multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the uplink scenario in massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO) communication systems using dense uniform linear arrays (ULAs) of antenna elements that are tightly packed within a confined space and equipped with low-resolution analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). We tackle the problem of power consumption reduction and hardware simplification while simultaneously improving the performance of quantized systems by exploring spatial oversampling. Due to the subwavelength inter-element spacing in dense ULAs, extrinsic spatial thermal noise correlations arise from the significant coupling between adjacent antenna terminals. In addition to this correlated extrinsic noise, the noise figure caused by hardware imperfections profoundly impacts signal recovery and cannot be simply neglected in system performance analysis. We propose a low-resolution multi-user detection method based on a modified version of the vector approximate message passing (VAMP) framework. We also conduct a state evolution analysis to characterize the asymptotic behaviour of the proposed algorithm. We demonstrate that spatial oversampling in the context of low-resolution communication substantially enhances system performance, bringing it closer to the ideal scenario with infinite-resolution ADCs. This reveals the benefits of spatial oversampling as an effective strategy for enhancing the performance of low-resolution massive MIMO systems. We also thoroughly analyze the impact of noise figure on signal recovery under spatial oversampling, thereby highlighting its significance in system design considerations1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207