MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105859447 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3633949

Enhancing O-Band PAM Performance With a CNN at Equal Complexity to an FIR Filter

2025· article· W7105859447 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFinite impulse responseMultiplexingArtificial neural networkPhotonicsOptical filterOptical communicationWavelength-division multiplexingLinear filterGaussian noiseOptical amplifierInfinite impulse response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple-level intensity-modulation with directdetection (IM/DD) is a cost-effective solution for increasing capacity within data centers and other short haul links. Conventional equalizers, typically based on linear filtering, are designed under Gaussian noise assumptions; amplified IM/DD links have non-Gaussian statistics. Neural network (NN) solutions can adapt naturally to both standard (Gaussian) and amplified (non-Gaussian) IM/DD systems. In contrast to previous research, we examine neural network implementations that incur no increase in complexity over simple, finite impulse response filtering. Comparing standard filtering with our NN solution, our experiments with a silicon photonic modulator in the Oband show gains from 0.25-0.75 dB in Q-factor across multiple wavelengths and fiber lengths. For example, a net rate of 100 Gb/s (post-KP4-FEC overhead) can be achieved at 1300 nm over 3.4 km. We achieved additional gain with a modified four-level constellation adapted to channel statistics. The same-complexity NN solution can be used for amplified IM/DD systems employing low-cost integrated semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs), such as metro/5G fronthaul links, and emerging multiplexing architectures with a shared laser and SOA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207