Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results Materials examined. GERMANY • 1 ♀; Baden-Württemberg, Tübingen, Hirschau, Taubenloch; alt. 408 m; 48.503966° N, 9.011266° E; 13–23 May 2014; T. Kothe, M. Engelhardt, D. Bartsch leg.; Malaise trap; SMNS _Hym_ Pla_000853 • 1 ♀; Baden-Württemberg, Tübingen, Hirschau, Oberes Tal; alt. 368 m; 48.505033° N, 8.993467° E; 23 May–6 Jul. 2014; T. Kothe, M. Engelhardt, D. Bartsch leg.; Malaise trap; GenBank OK001959; SMNS _ Hym_Pla_000352 • 1 ♀; Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Espan; 48.813611° N, 9.250278° E; 1–14 Jun. 2014; F. Woog leg.; Malaise trap; GenBank OK001960; SMNS _Hym_Pla000766 • 1 ♀; Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Insel Rügen, Kniepow; alt. 50 m; 54.350436° N, 13.354879° E; 17–23 May 2015; F. Koch leg.; Malaise trap; GenBank OK001961; SMNS _Hym_Pla_000800. Distribution. Platystasius is known to occur in Canada, Central Australia, Europe, and Northern Africa (Masner and Huggert 1989). However, no species have been described from outside of Europe. Platystasius transversus has been previously recorded from the Czech Republic, Ireland, Moldova, Morocco, Sweden, and the UK (Masner 1956; Kozlov 1988; Mitroiu and Johnson 2021). It is here reported for the first time from Germany. Barcode data. The closest match to the German specimens (93.3% identical) was collected in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (BOLD record HPPPK892-13, museum ID BIOUG07671-E04). The record is identified as Platygastridae and does not have an image. Another high match (92.5% identical) was collected in Bruce Peninsula National Park, Ontario, Canada (BOLD record CNBPF162-12, museum ID BIOUG04347-D10). The record is identified as Platygastrinae and the specimen image is recognizable as Platystasius. These results confirm that our barcodes are the first obtained for P. transversus and the first identified for Platystasius. They also suggest that there are undescribed species of Platystasius in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.412 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".