MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7105930757 · doi:10.23952/jano.7.2025.3.03

The topological derivative method for optimum shape design and control of gas networks

2025· article· W7105930757 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Derivative (finance)Stability (learning theory)Control (management)Control theory (sociology)Class (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, topological derivatives are defined and employed for gas transport networks governed by nonlinear hyperbolic systems of PDEs.The concept of topological derivatives of a shape functional is introduced for optimum design and control of gas networks.First, the dynamic model for the network is considered.The cost for the control problem includes the deviations of the pressure at the inflow and outflow nodes.For dynamic control problems of gas networks when the turnpike property occurs, the synthesis of control and optimum design of the network can be simplified.That is, the design of the network can be performed for optimal control of the steady-state network model.The cost of design is defined by the optimal control cost for the steady-state network model.The topological derivative of the design cost, given by the optimal control cost with respect to the nucleation of a small cycle, is determined.Tree-structured networks can be decomposed into single network junctions.The topological derivative of the design cost is systematically evaluated at each junction of the decomposed network.This allows for the identification of internal nodes with negative topological derivatives, where replacing the node with a small cycle leads to an improved design cost.As the set of network junctions is finite, the iterative procedure is convergent.This design procedure is applied to representative examples and it can be generalized to arbitrary network graphs.A key feature of such modeling approach is the availability of exact steady-state solutions, enabling a fully analytical topological analysis of the design cost without numerical approximations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied and Numerical OptimizationSame topicIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207