MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106002954 · doi:10.7939/83360

Heterogeneity of Externalizing and Internalizing Symptoms in Early Childhood: The Role of Peer Relationships

2025· dissertation· en· W7106002954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressionExternalizationPoison controlPsychopathologyAssociation (psychology)Peer relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have examined the developmental trajectories of forms of externalizing (e.g., overt aggression, hyperactivity) and internalizing (e.g., anxiety, depression) symptoms, with some attention to heterogeneity in these trajectories across early childhood. How heterogeneity in forms of externalizing symptoms co-occurs with heterogeneity in forms of internalizing symptoms has received less attention. The quality of peer relationships might also differentiate between the co-occurring externalizing and internalizing symptom trajectories. A total of 443 children from diverse ethnic backgrounds were recruited from two preschool programs in Northwestern Canada (47.9% girls and 52.1% boys, Mage = 4.11 years, SD = .35). Children’s externalizing (overt aggression and hyperactivity) and internalizing (anxiety and depression) symptoms were rated by teachers in the fall and spring of preschool and kindergarten. The quality of children’s peer relationships was assessed in the fall of preschool from teacher-reports and observations. Latent Growth Mixture Models (LGMMs) were used to examine heterogeneity in the trajectories of the externalizing and internalizing symptoms constructs. Sequential process LGMMs were used to identify the co-occurring externalizing and internalizing trajectories. Two trajectories were identified for each construct, with the majority of children classified in typical low stable trajectories (85-94%) and a small proportion classified in moderate to high chronic trajectories (5-15%). Four trajectories were identified for the co-occurring externalizing and internalizing trajectories; the majority of children were classified in typical low co-occurring trajectories (76-83%), modest proportions of children were classified in comorbid decreasing trajectories (8-15%), and small proportions of children were classified in comorbid elevated (2-5%) and decreasing anxious symptoms (3-5%) trajectories. Girls were less likely to be classified in the comorbid decreasing trajectories compared to the typical low co-occurring trajectories. Children who experienced more peer rejection and peer conflict and fewer prosocial behaviours in preschool were more likely to be classified in the comorbid decreasing and elevated trajectories. These findings enhance understanding of variation in the co-occurring developmental trajectories of externalizing and internalizing symptoms in early childhood. Intervention strategies for teachers and caregivers to support young children’s development in the classroom and home setting are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207