MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106029699 · doi:10.7939/83554

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis program performance in Alberta, Canada, A population-based evaluation

2025· dissertation· en· W7106029699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicTuberculosisConfidence intervalIncidence (geometry)PopulationImmigrationHealth careRelative risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic imposed major disruptions to essential tuberculosis (TB) services globally. We evaluated the performance of the TB program in Alberta, Canada by comparing two periods - before and during the pandemic - to estimate the local impact of those disruptions. METHODS: Ten program performance indicators and their related targets were applied and compared by period. These include a measure of decline in the age- and sex-adjusted incidence by population group, proportion of recently-arrived immigrants screened on time, five case management and three close contact management indicators. Performance targets were measured by time period and clinic type – outpatient vs virtual. The latter did not see patients face-to-face. An interrupted time series analysis estimated the COVID-19 impact on timeliness of immigrant screening. RESULTS: The rate of disease by population group was not remarkably different, pre-pandemic vs pandemic. Over a more extended period of time, the rate in the Canadian-born but not the foreign-born, declined. Local program performance was not negatively affected by COVID-19 in general, but there was a large reduction in immigration and in turn the number of immigrants referred for screening (37.6%) and contacts identified for assessment (71.8%) during the pandemic, resulting in improvements to the proportion of referrals assessed (91.7% vs 96.6%, relative risk and 95% confidence interval 0.949 (0.936-0.962)), contacts assessed (81.7% vs 90.0%, 0.908 (0.875-0.943)), and contacts completing treatment of infection (90.4% vs 97.1%, 0.931 (0.886-0.979)). Among patients with TB disease, monitoring of treatment response was suboptimal while other targets were met or nearly met. Virtual clinic performance tended to be worse during the pandemic. INTERPRETATION: COVID-19 related disruptions were not as significant in the Alberta TB program as elsewhere with multiple likely explanations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207