MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106037997 · doi:10.1355/9789815306484

Putin’s Russia and Southeast Asia

2024· book· W7106037997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBelt and Road Initiative
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoutheast asiaBeijingQuarter (Canadian coin)ChinaPower (physics)Cold warPosition (finance)Foreign policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the first major study of Russia-Southeast Asia relations since the end of the Cold War, Ian Storey traces the dramatic shifts in Moscow’s interests in the region under President Vladimir Putin. He skillfully assesses the long-lasting legacy of the Soviet Union, traces the evolution of Putin’s foreign policy and identifies the driving forces behind the Kremlin’s Pivot to Asia. With expert insights, Storey examines Russia’s political, economic and military engagement with ASEAN and each of the eleven Southeast Asian countries over the past quarter of a century. He also delivers an in-depth analysis of how Southeast Asia responded to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and what the Russia-Ukraine War means for Moscow’s great power ambitions in the region and beyond. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian Storey charts Russia’s pivot away from Europe towards Asia through its largely neglected and often misunderstood relationships in Southeast Asia. He deftly unpicks and rightsizes the Kremlin’s influence in the region—all against the backdrop of Moscow’s increasing dependency on Beijing after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is an in-depth and comprehensive study, packed with new information and firsthand perspectives, which will be of great value to anyone trying to understand the complex dynamics in Russian foreign policy. Dr Fiona Hill, Senior Fellow, The Bookings Institution; co-author of Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin Ian Storey has addressed a serious gap in our studies of modern Russia’s influence around the world with this clear and well-researched study of Moscow’s waxing and waning position in Southeast Asia, a story of a weak hand made weaker by its invasion of Ukraine. Mark Galeotti, Honorary Professor, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies; author of Putin’s Wars: From Chechnya to Ukraine Vladimir Putin is firmly convinced that Russia is a great power with global reach. In this deeply researched and compelling book, Ian Storey shows that, despite Russia’s vaunted pivot away from the West and towards Asia, these ambitions remain unrealized in Southeast Asia. Storey fills a major gap in the literature on Russian foreign policy with this clear and comprehensive account of Russia’s faltering economic, military and diplomatic efforts in the region. Russia is a minor player in Southeast Asia compared to China and the United States, and Storey shows how Putin’s reckless war against Ukraine has further limited Russia’s prospects in this dynamic region of growing importance. Professor Brian D. Taylor, Director of the Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs, Maxwell School, Syracuse University; author of Russian Politics: A Very Short Introduction A thoroughly researched and highly readable overview of a much-neglected topic. I was left thinking, “How has no one thought of writing this before?” Professor James D. Brown, Temple University, Japan; author of Cracking the Crab: Russian Espionage Against Japan, from Peter the Great to Richard Sorge

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBelt and Road InitiativeFrench-language works237,207