MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106038200 · doi:10.7939/83161

A Comparison of Deadwood Characteristics in Post-harvest and Post-fire Island Remnants in Upper Foothill Natural Subregion of Alberta

2025· dissertation· en· W7106038200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoarse woody debrisTaigaAbundance (ecology)BorealNatural (archaeology)Forest managementDisturbance (geology)Fire regimeSnag

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Across the globe, forest management has evolved from a limited focus on timber extraction to management for a much broader set of values. Through this evolution, Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) has emerged as a pivotal strategy, with Natural-Disturbance-Based Management (NDBM) aiming to minimize anthropogenic impacts on forest ecosystems. Although retention practices in boreal forests are informed by natural disturbance, i.e. patterns of forest structure remaining after wildfires, few studies have compared the structure and diversity of patch retention and fire skips (islands). Understanding this comparison is crucial for assessing whether retention patches can serve as effective ecological analogs to fire skips, particularly as their structural characteristics may diverge or converge over time. Coarse woody debris (CWD) is an important structural element influenced by forest management worldwide. In this study, we compared the abundance and spatial distribution of recent deadwood across post-fire and post-harvest remnant islands in Upper foothill Natural Subregion of Alberta, Canada, approximately a decade after disturbance. We surveyed 28 sites (14 fire-origin, 14 harvest-origin), each comprising seven circular plots (7.3 m radius) along a 90 m transect, and measured CWD attributes using the line-intersect method. I tested for differences in recent deadwood volume, abundance and mean diameter of snag, log and live trees between post fire and post-harvest retention patches along with their reference forests (closest natural undisturbed forests) using mixed effects models. A power analysis confirmed that the model had sufficient sensitivity (power >80%) to detect differences between disturbance types. The results showed no significant differences in total recent CWD volume between fire and harvest islands, suggesting that structurally designed harvest patches can retain deadwood volumes comparable to those following natural disturbance. Furthermore, deadwood volumes in remnant interiors were statistically similar to those in undisturbed reference forests, highlighting the potential of islands regardless of origin as structural analogues in managed landscapes. Edge-to-interior gradients showed that fire islands retained fewer but larger structural elements, while harvest islands exhibited higher stem abundance of smaller size. Initial stand volume (ISV) emerged as the strongest predictor of CWD accumulation, with a pronounced increase beyond 200 m³/ha. These results underscore the importance of selecting high-ISV patches for retention and suggest that ecologically-informed harvest designs can effectively preserve structural complexity and legacy functions in boreal forest systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207