MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106047455 · doi:10.7939/83460

Habitat Selection by Sandhill Cranes (Antigone canadensis) in Alberta using passive acoustics

2025· dissertation· en· W7106047455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSandhillHabitatPopulationBorealNesting (process)Grus (genus)Critical habitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mid-continent population of Sandhill Cranes (Antigone canadensis) is the largest population of cranes in North America. Alberta has a large migratory Sandhill Crane population, with the Rocky Mountains acting as a choke point funneling birds through the province as they move north to the Canadian territories, Alaska, and Siberia. But Alberta has a small nesting population, and to date no studies have been conducted on nesting Sandhill Cranes in the province. Alberta’s Boreal Forest ecosystem varies substantially from southern Sandhill Crane nesting habitat and conventional nesting habitat selection may not apply to much of Alberta’s nesting population. The primary goal of this study is to reduce the knowledge gap surrounding Alberta’s Sandhill Crane population and what they require for breeding habitat. Using a systematic random sampling design, and autonomous recording units deployed by the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, we demonstrated the viability of using passive acoustics to estimate resource selection functions to identify high-quality nesting season habitats in Alberta, while also determining the effects of weather on migratory behaviour. We estimated a resource selection function during the Sandhill Crane nesting season using a used/available design, while using k-fold cross validation to validate our map of the Sandhill Crane nesting habitats across northern Alberta. We then examined the effect of weather conditions on flight behaviour during the spring migration using a generalized linear mixed-effect model. Cranes selected for bogs and fens for breeding but avoided high canopy closure, areas of high forest harvest, and crop land. While on spring migration the cranes selected habitat similarly to the nesting season although they did not appear to be selecting against areas of forest harvest. We found that in tandem with selected landcover, a reduction in average daily barometric pressure from the day previous had the greatest grounding effect on migratory flight behaviour with the change in barometric pressure performing better than just landscape features alone, but the lack of covariate significance did limit our ability to make inferences on this effect. Our map of nesting season Sandhill Crane habitat can serve as an effective tool for understanding and preserving high quality Sandhill Crane habitat in Alberta, while the high predictability of our model illustrates the viability of resource selection functions with passive acoustic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207