MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106094831

E. A. Butti : portrait d'un écrivain mineur

2024· dissertation· fr· W7106094831 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDecadence, Literature, and Society
Canadian institutionsAssociation for Canadian and Québec Literatures
FundersModerna
KeywordsPortraitMinor (academic)History of literatureMiddle AgesFrench literaturePeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the panorama of Italian literature at the end of the nineteenth century Enrico Annibale Butti (Milan 1868 - Milan 1912) has a more than minor place. Born in the same decade as Federico De Roberto (1861), Italo Svevo (1861), Gabriele D'Annunzio (1863) and Luigi Pirandello (1867), he is known mainly for his dramas, performed from 1890, and whose most noted are Fiamme nell'ombra (1904) and Lucifero (1901). Before devoting himself to theater - around twenty plays performed between 1889 and 1913 - he wrote five psychological novels: L'immorale (written in 1889, published five years later), L'automa (1892), L'anima (1893), L'incantesimo (1897), including one unfinished: L'ombra della croce (1905). The thesis covers his entire literary production and provides new elements on the author's biography. An important place is reserved for the research of his unlisted texts: news, articles, diary. Butti is put in contact with other writers of the same period, and a reflection is carried out on his role in Italian and French literature. In the thesis the reasons which determined his exclusion from the history of literature are studied and the emblematic portrait of this minor writer is drawn up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicDecadence, Literature, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207