NEAT: Signatures Observables de la Gravité Non-Métrique Fermée: Trois Prédictions Robustes Issues du Cadre NEAT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We identify three robust and observationally accessible predictions of metric-closed non-metric gravity, as formulated in the NEAT framework.Because the Weyl trace vector remains strictly algebraic and introduces no new dynamical degrees of freedom, the theory yields controlled and model-independent deviations from General Relativity in strong-field regimes while preserving all weak-field tests.We show that NEAT generically predicts:(1) a universal and sign-controlled dephasing of black-hole quasinormal modes due to Weyl-induced near-horizon corrections;(2) a small but characteristic anisotropy in the photon ring and lensing structure around compact objects;and (3) a suppression of inspiral energy loss encoded in the gravitational-wave chirp, governed by the falloff properties of the Weyl sector.All three signatures are compatible with Solar-System constraints and remain testable with current and near-future interferometric and horizon-scale observations.This establishes the observational relevance of NEAT as a metric-closed extension of General Relativity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".