MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106131403 · doi:10.13136/1120-4699/30/2/093

Marduk in The Neo-Assyrian Royal Inscriptions from Adad-Nārārī Ⅱ to Sennacherib

2025· article· en· W7106131403 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversità degli Studi di Verona · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignBattleIdeologyStatueCharacter (mathematics)Silence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marduk appeared in the Neo-Assyrian royal inscriptions since the reign of Adad-nārārī Ⅱ. From the reign of Adad-nārārī Ⅱ onwards, his status in royal ideologies began to be increased, and he gradu-ally acquired various roles in Assyrian imperialism and kingship. During the early reign of Tiglath-pileser Ⅲ, Marduk’s prominence was still visible. Sargon Ⅱ continued this trend and elevated Mar-duk to a new level. Sargon Ⅱ’s policies were deemed as “too Babylonian” by his son, Sennacherib, who reversed course in order to de-Babylonianise Assyria. After about a decade of almost total silence on Marduk (and Bēl) in his royal inscriptions, Marduk began to be mentioned after 691 BC, which is the year that Sennacherib fought the battle of Ḫalule against the Babylonians and their allies, followed by the capture of Babylon and the destruction of Marduk’s statue in 689 BC. A detailed examination of Marduk’s character and status in the royal ideologies from Adad-nārārī Ⅱ to Sennacherib serves to better contextualize Sennacherib’s policies to erase Marduk and de-Baby-lonianise Assyria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversità degli Studi di VeronaSame topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207