MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106216648 · doi:10.1016/j.nxsust.2025.100219

Morpho-physiological response of water leaf (Talinum triangulare Jacq) to urea and Azomite

2025· article· en· W7106216648 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNext Sustainability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranspirationPhotosynthesisUreaStomatal conductanceFactorial experimentBiomass (ecology)NitrogenFertilizerCrop yield

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cultivation of waterleaf ( Talinum triangulare ) is crucial to mitigate its overexploitation from the wild; however, optimal fertilizer strategies remain poorly explored. Azomite, a naturally occurring mineral complex, is gaining interest in sustainable agriculture for its ability to improve plant growth and stress resilience without the environmental footprint of synthetic fertilizers. This study evaluated the novel combination of urea nitrogen (N) and Azomite supplementation on the growth and physiology of waterleaf plants to determine a sustainable fertilization strategy. Using a 2 × 6 factorial completely randomized design, plants were subjected to six N rates (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 kg/ha) with or without Azomite (12.45 g/pot). The results revealed a critical threshold for urea application with rates ≥ 150 kg/ha inducing severe ammonium toxicity, culminating in complete plant mortality at 250 kg/ha. In contrast, 50 kg/ha N rate was identified as optimal, significantly (P < 0.05) enhancing morphological traits such as increasing plant height, stem diameter, leaf number and branch number by 21–300 %, and boosting fresh and dry biomass by 281 % and 154 %, respectively compared to the control. The synergistic application of 50 kg/ha N with Azomite further amplified these benefits driving the most robust improvements in plant architecture and photosynthetic capacity. This combination resulted in a photosynthetic rate of 6.41 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ and a transpiration rate of 4.50 mol m⁻² s⁻¹ , significantly higher than all other treatments. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed that the 50 kg/ha N and 50 kg/ha N with Azomite treatments were strongly associated with superior growth and physiological performance. In conclusion, 50 kg/ha is the optimal urea-N rate for waterleaf, with Azomite supplementation providing significant synergistic growth benefits. This strategy offers a practical efficient solution for enhancing waterleaf productivity while minimizing the risks of nitrogen toxicity and environmental pollution. • First study on the combined effects of urea and azomite on Talinum triangulare growth. • Optimal nitrogen rate identified as 50 kg/ha for growth and physiological performance. • Azomite supplementation enhanced plant height, leaf size, and photosynthetic rate. • Excess nitrogen (≥100 kg/ha) suppressed growth parameters in waterleaf. • Findings provide sustainable fertilization strategy for smallholder and urban farmers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNext SustainabilitySame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207