MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heavenly Bodies

2025· book-chapter· en· W7106226421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganic Chemistry Synthesis Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionSiriusConjunction (astronomy)AnalogyEPICQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Beginning with the much-discussed pair of similes in Books 5 and 6 likening Jason to Sirius, Chapter 14 argues that Valerius draws an analogy between Jason and Sirius outside of these similes, as well, in the closing books of the epic. It demonstrates that there is a meaningful conjunction between Jason as Sirius and Absyrtus and Aron as two other bright celestial bodies, the sun and the morning star, hinting at the conditions for cosmic ekpyrosis. It then turns to an earlier episode in the epic, the rape of Hylas, and argues that a set of connections between Hylas’s depiction at the moment of his rape and a network of reflected light similes in Greek and Latin epic helps to figure Hylas, too, as an embodiment of the morning star. A concluding discussion of the phrase tale iubar, used in describing both Hylas and the Temple of the Sun at Colchis, looks forward to the next chapter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganic Chemistry Synthesis MethodsFrench-language works237,207