Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the Moose's Trail . . . Artistic Journeying and Cultural ReappropriationCultural reappropriation involves acquiring the knowledge and skills that ceased to be passed down through generations.For individuals and communities alike, this process is driven by a sense of cultural loss or the erosion of traditional identity references.It serves as a response to the blending of cultures, where they intermingle and influence each other.Whatever cultural reappropriation may be, it must be distinguished from cultural appropriation.Although the latter is inseparable from the reappropriation of a cultural heritage, it also denotes a contested practice involving the usurpation of a cultural identity.In other words, an individual or even a group with a shared quest claims the cultural identity of another culture.Among minority groups, such as the First Peoples of Canada, the preservation of traditions and cultural appreciation give rise to initiatives promoting knowledge transmission.This entails reaching out to "tradition bearers" who have inherited teachings from their predecessors and who, through the transmission of heritage, provide a form of "cultural security" to members of their community.This revitalization may rely on the support of related communities where language and traditions remain vibrant.These cultural reappropriation efforts contribute to the process of decolonization and affirmation in which Canada's First Peoples are engaged.The 19 th century in Canada marked an era of territorial dispossession and state control over the fate of Quebec's 11 Indigenous Nations.Due to demographic changes, such as the gradual loss of military ally status, colonization, and the exploitation of forest resources on Indigenous lands, former allies were condemned to become wards of the state.This dispossession is evident through the establishment of the first reserves, which were parcels of land set aside for Indigenous use but under federal jurisdiction and administered by a band council and an Indian Affairs agent.It is also reflected in the adoption of the Indian Act in 1876, which aimed to govern all aspects of the lives of the original inhabitants, even to the point of defining the criteria of national belonging based on blood quantum.The Canadian government pursued an assimilation policy intended to turn Indigenous Peoples into "ordinary citizens", which was perceived, from a 19 th -century ideological perspective, as a near-messianic mission.The rigid benches of residen-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.117 | 0.062 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".