MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106328890 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113673

Zero-shot transfer learning for structural damage detection using target-to-source structure domain data mapping

2025· article· en· W7106328890 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderBenchmark (surveying)Transfer of learningDomain (mathematical analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)Parametric statisticsLabeled dataField (mathematics)Structural health monitoring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of structural health monitoring (SHM), transferring damage detection knowledge, e.g., parametric models trained with structural damage across different structures or damage types (namely, domains), is pivotal in addressing the reliance on gathering labeled data from test (target) structures. Recently, powerful Deep Learning models in conjunction with Transfer Learning (TL) have been explored to accommodate the process; however they still show limited generalizability across different types of structures. This paper introduces a novel approach for zero-shot TL in SHM, leveraging autoencoders to facilitate structural damage detection in the presence of limited training data. The proposed approach employs an autoencoder that maps undamaged data from the target domain to the undamaged data of the source domain. This mapping enables a damage detection model, trained exclusively on the source domain, to effectively identify anomalies in the transformed target domain data without requiring additional training or labeled target data. This unique framework allows the autoencoder to effectively capture the underlying structural characteristics by learning to map the target domain to the source domain, thereby facilitating knowledge transfer. Training an autoencoder to map from undamaged data in the target structure to undamaged data in the source structure also transfers knowledge related to damaged data. Once the autoencoder has experienced this mapping, it is leveraged to the source structure to detect any damage in the target structure. To diagnose damage, a trained one-class support vector machine is used on the source structure to identify any anomalies in the target structure. The resulting outcome of two benchmark problems underscores the efficacy of the proposed method in accurately reconstructing source domain data from target domain inputs, thereby demonstrating its potential to enhance structural damage detection using limited training data. Moreover, for the studied cases, the adaptability of the proposed approach to different structural benchmark types demonstrates a strong ability to surpass typical structural similarity requirements in TL-SHM applications. Thus, with further experiments and development, it can support the creation of SHM tools suitable for large-scale adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207