MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106328890 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113673

Zero-shot transfer learning for structural damage detection using target-to-source structure domain data mapping

2025· article· en· W7106328890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderBenchmark (surveying)Transfer of learningDomain (mathematical analysis)Pattern recognition (psychology)Parametric statisticsLabeled dataField (mathematics)Structural health monitoring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of structural health monitoring (SHM), transferring damage detection knowledge, e.g., parametric models trained with structural damage across different structures or damage types (namely, domains), is pivotal in addressing the reliance on gathering labeled data from test (target) structures. Recently, powerful Deep Learning models in conjunction with Transfer Learning (TL) have been explored to accommodate the process; however they still show limited generalizability across different types of structures. This paper introduces a novel approach for zero-shot TL in SHM, leveraging autoencoders to facilitate structural damage detection in the presence of limited training data. The proposed approach employs an autoencoder that maps undamaged data from the target domain to the undamaged data of the source domain. This mapping enables a damage detection model, trained exclusively on the source domain, to effectively identify anomalies in the transformed target domain data without requiring additional training or labeled target data. This unique framework allows the autoencoder to effectively capture the underlying structural characteristics by learning to map the target domain to the source domain, thereby facilitating knowledge transfer. Training an autoencoder to map from undamaged data in the target structure to undamaged data in the source structure also transfers knowledge related to damaged data. Once the autoencoder has experienced this mapping, it is leveraged to the source structure to detect any damage in the target structure. To diagnose damage, a trained one-class support vector machine is used on the source structure to identify any anomalies in the target structure. The resulting outcome of two benchmark problems underscores the efficacy of the proposed method in accurately reconstructing source domain data from target domain inputs, thereby demonstrating its potential to enhance structural damage detection using limited training data. Moreover, for the studied cases, the adaptability of the proposed approach to different structural benchmark types demonstrates a strong ability to surpass typical structural similarity requirements in TL-SHM applications. Thus, with further experiments and development, it can support the creation of SHM tools suitable for large-scale adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it